This octave of neglect now ends. This being Saturday evening, I gladly await the start of classes on Monday the 30th. Whereas peers of mine frequently wonder at the speed with which our lives have progressed, for me God has moved time at just the right pace. Glories there are to a senior year. As Atobe pointed out when he returned today, I shall be an upperclassmen, or senpai, in the Japanese, in the truest sense of the term, receiving the admiration we once gave our illustrious forebears, and living the power and authority I merit as a four year member of the Student Senate. As in the corresponding senior year of high school, I am ready for these blessings, which have arrived neither a moment too soon nor too late. In the spirit of "One More Time", a fine and relatively innocent dance tune by some Daft Punk, the beat of life, this
Music's got me feeling so freeWe're gonna celebrate
One more time
Yes, even we Naulties and non-substancers.
Granted, our seniority has not availed universally. Despite a streak of drizzly and unfathomably chilly days, my eminent SGA colleagues and I (our core of pro-Catholic mission senators has been jokingly termed the SGA Brain Trust by a friend) were unable to prevent our participation in the universally-detested and indoctrination-rife Student Leadership Camp. Included this year were multicultural awareness activities reminiscent of my elementary school brainwashing. By their structure the activities assumed, a priori, that all common notions about different races, believers of different religions (ex. Muslims, Jews, and Catholics), and even such groups as teenagers and the elderly are "stereotypes": that is, not grounded in reality. I don't know about you, but it'll be a long day when I believe teens are not, in fact, bad drivers. Besides the relativism inherent in multiculturalism, this ideological cancer prevents the "critical thinking" educators are supposedly so eager to encourage. To make things worse, the rain ensured that even the traditional delights of midnight pranking were off.
At least there is good news: the Brain Trust has a potential new prospect, in a gentleman who goes by J. Paul. As I told him, had I that moniker, I would always be adopting the persona of the late Supreme Pontiff of the same name in my varied discourses. Speaking of whom, I just finished his Memory and Identity, his conversational look, a few years into the third Christian millennium, at global politics, the future of nation and state, and the evil ideologies of the last century. Given the liberal reputation traditionalists rightly give Pope John Paul II for his treatment of the Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX, it was surprisingly good. While John Paul praises the Enlightenment belief in the rights of man and "liberty, equality, and fraternity" (the last of which is quite popular at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute across town, now that I think of it), an overly positive view of Vatican II, and claims the post-Reformation wars of religion were not in the spirit of the
Gospels (I, of course, would have been the first to serve under the Iron Duke on his heretic-crushing campaign; and it were better for the tolerati, that millstone were hanged about their necks, and they cast into the sea, than that they should let the schismatics scandalize one of these faithful), he defends the nation (as distinct from the State) as natural and irreplaceable, forever setting aside the claims of post-nationalist Catholic liberals. Besides the few defects I mentioned just now, Memory and Identity would make a wonderful companion book to the Catholic political thinker Pierre Manent's A World Beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State, which also discusses the essentiality of the nation in the context of the horrors of nazism and communism, and of the drawbacks of modern liberalism--of course, for someone as widely read as me, everything seems like a good companion book to any work written on such great and general themes! Additionally, John Paul uses the example of his native Poland in explaining the nation to his readers, and I for one was intrigued by his accounts of that Catholic nation about which I know so very little. Overall, a very profitable read, which may be read in two or three determined days if you are reading on a schedule. Now, for my first anime break in eight long days!
2 Comments:
I would just like your thoughts on why you consider multiculturalism an ideological cancer. As one who studies, explores, and ponders the workings of many cultures from language to practices, I respectfully disagree with said phrase.
I believe I had just explained it in the post. Multiculturalism, rather than endearing a man f to his own traditions and encouraging him to see himself as a member of humanity through his ancestors and their history, treats all cultures as equal in that, not only does it not judge their practices against a moral standard, but obligates the individual to celebrate other cultures even should he choose to never leave his native soil.
In layman's terms, everything I've ever seen connected with the term multiculturalism (via such apparati as the Office of Multicultural Affairs) has been about organizing foreign festivities out of their context, guilting white Christians in one way or another, and shotgunning white, multigenerational Americans into backing mass immigration that will make us a minority in our own country. We (and every native population in this circumstance) inevitably lose out. Even if the multi-cultis give us an equal share of respect, we still lack the predominance needed to make our culture a norm within our own borders. I s'pose you could label me an ethnopluralist dissatisfied with mere equality in our home of centuries.
You do not need to embrace said cancerous ideology to learn about other cultures in the way you describe. But at the end of the day, leave them be, and expect them to do the same. Verily, it is my beloved Japan, a homogeneous nation with low, manageable immigration which sets the standard; we westerners are just too cowardly to preserve ourselves from threats to culture.
A culture that constitutes a norm is the only thing that can protect a locale from the ravages of capitalism, which leave it's victims with no more identity than egalitarian slogans and the Love on their t-shirt. (The problem, of course, is: New England already has less of a culture than anywhere, except perhaps in literature and colonial architecture. I can only hope some discouragement of immigration and trade, which wouldn't have been necessary in better times, might allow us to create one.)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home