A well-deserved snow day, and much enjoyed, is just wrapping up. While I still got a lot done, completing another sonnet that I will perhaps post later, and also finishing Dickens' The Cricket on the Hearth wherein I had long been bogged down, the general attitude on campus reminds me of the guy on the Milligan's Island ginger ale logo. Except it's a bit colder here.What to do on a lazy snow day? Chronicle liturgical abuse, of course. It is the traditionalist's surest reflex. Although we are much indebted to the thorough work of Chris Gillibrand of Catholic Church Conservation, his content seems to be off for now, and he usually reports the goings-on in Germany and the rest of the Continent. But there has been liturgical abuse in our own back yard. Good intentions aside, whenever I walk into the Chapel of the Holy Spirit, I cannot help but get this feeling.
I have seen many sanctuaries in my time. As the name implies, they are sacred, and should look like this (at the minimum)

not like this

It's hard to see, but the display is made from some of the debris from the Great Ice Storm of 2008. At first edging arithmetically upwards, at the end a here barely perceptable branch shoots up, sort of like in Al Gore's hockeystick CO2 graph in An Inconvenient Truth.

True, the sanctuary looks like a stage, and was just asking for this, but all of these types of displays are so... formless. As such, they do not direct our minds upward by their beauty. You may say, To each his own; to me this is beautiful. I say: the sanctuary is where the consecration happens, where bread and wine are changed into the Body and Blood of the King of kings, and where He should be permanently enthroned in the tabernacle (that Christ is cordoned off to the side is another offense to His dignity): anything in the sanctuary should have a clear purpose in or in inspiring worship, and should be at least worthy of a monarch's throne room. This seasonal display fits neither criterion.
And if you still don't think that's bad, every Lent they take away our Holy Water (even if it's become a common practice, they shouldn't) and instead give us

if you can't see them from there,

sea glass. We are supposed to take a piece with us, and place it in a jar when we have done some sort of good work, et cetera. What ever happened to recalling our baptismal vows, and purifying ourselves as we enter the house of the Lord? However, I think I will save mine: that way, I can have it as a memento of the Age of Liturgical Abuse once it is long past. Better yet, some Catholic publisher should make a coffee table book chock full of images of the liturgical (and visual) abuse now so common, but which will largely disappear once the Traditional Latin Mass becomes standard issue again (as is inevitable considering the growth of traditionalist orders and the decline of everyone else). A CD of Dan Shutte tunes could accompany the tome, that future generations could also know the auditory abuse we must suffer through.
15 Comments:
Bravo! Hilarious and delectably true. Veritatis splendor, man...and how.
I'll admit, people should clean up before walking into mass, like the picture in the link you've included. However, I don't see the necessity for of having an elaborate and glitzy sanctuary. We cannot deny that the church is currently in a financial rut, and such iodecor seems to be almost foolish and irresponsible. Our Catholic schools have very little money and are closing at an alarming rate, our priests are disappearing faster than sand slips through one's fingers, and meanwhile we unabashedly decorate with gold, silver and gems, and order enormous and largely unnecessary floral displays for every single holiday. I strongly feel that the Church needs to reconsider how its money is being spent. We could use that money to make our schools stronger, to reinforce Catholic educational and evangelical programs in order to recruit new members to the Faith, and to help build better programs within each diocese to bring more people come to recognize their vocations within the Church. It seems that our priests are very holy men, but poor businessmen. I would MUCH rather give up all the gold, silver, gems, incense, ivory, and flora in every Church around the world and see even just one more person come to eternal salvation through a stronger evangelical program produced by the Catholic Church.
The Eucharist was originally distributed in a wooden (maybe, if it was REALLY fancy, a metal) cup over a wooden table on which everyone had just finished dinner, and it was entirely possible that there was straw on the brick/stone floor with a chicken or two running around. In fact, that's where the tradition began of the priest washing his hands before the Consecration; there were often so many animals in the homes where the Eucharist was first Consecrated that they felt compelled to clean themselves beforehand. I suppose that I, too, can call myself a traditionalist, but of a slightly different kind. Instead of pre-Vatican II, I hope to go back to how it was before Rome institutionalized Catholicism! Not that I want persecution, but to have mass in more humble, personal and spiritual settings following a feast with everyone from the parish, as well scripture readings, psalms, and a sermon given by the priest on what we have gone over that day. I want mass to be what it was when Christians were still hiding underground, and were dirt poor with no money to afford all the pomp and circumstance that we have now. Christianity, without a doubt, caught on faster (in the letters of the New Testament, HUNDREDS came to follow Christ each day!) than it ever had in any time period.
While I'm not at all a huge fan of people showing up to church in sweatpants and basketball jerseys, I'd rather see a more humble sanctuary, knowing that our children are being better educated in the Catholic Tradition in our schools, and that more people are coming to know Christ through the work of the church.
Thank you Ian. Thank you Stephen. While I agree that other matters of the college might take orecedence in the budget (there may be better things we can do to make Catholicism appreciated by the student body, since most of the people who attend Mass are among the most pious anyway), but it is clear that the college has showed little concern for better liturgucal art for decades. To some extent, once we settled on a chapel that looks like a toolshed, all was said and done.
My brand of Catholicism is indeed very different from yours, Stephen, even though I know you're also a faithful Catholic who accepts all the Church's teachings. But returning to the liturgical practice from the earliest days seems like returning to the early sprout of a mustard seed. We started small, but now that the Church is blessed with wealth, more or less, armed with that same faith of our forefathers, we should build beautiful churches which express our faith in a corporeal way that the early faithful never had a chance to. I regard the spirit of a return to the liturgy and church architecture of the earliest days as a sort of false archaeologism. Of course, the Mass must retain the original elements from the Last Supper, but it should be allowed to flourish into the blossom of the Tridentine Latin Mass. We need not have gold and silver- the altar in the Immaculate Heart of Mary chapel used by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire is somewhat makeshift and probably not too expensive, but still very regal- but true, I share the views of the Abbot Suger when it comes to liturgical art.
Ahhh, good to know! I apologize... I had assumed that you were all for the diamonds and rubies based on the pictures that you had posted. I have to agree with you somewhat. I exaggerated a bit when I said I wanted to go quite that far back, but I still would prefer the Church to return to a slightly more personal look while still retaining elements of respect and regality. It's pretty hard to hit that magic 'in between' number, but I have been to several churches that have accomplished it very nicely. The church my wife and I currently attend, St. Joseph's in Epping, NH is plain enough to the point where it is not over-the-top and inexpensive to maintain, yet appealing enough to keep the congregation focused and reverent. I also imagine that a lot of it has to do with the pastor, Fr. Von. A Church is little more than a pretty building if it doesn't have a strong, spiritual leader such as Fr. Von.
That's understandable. I am glad your wife and you are happy with the churches in your area.
I stand, not midway between the viewpoints, because midway is not the appropriate word. Let me think: I gravitate toward the ~more~ ornate that can be complementary to the liturgy and that is designed/crafted/geared for the uplifting of minds to God. For this reason, I'm very much a fan of the sort of hybrid stylism one notices in Crusader88's favored sanctuary--Love that sacred design, for here we see some of the best elements of both Latin and Eastern Orthodox architectural features that astonish and inspire, rendered with an awesome simplicity. Love that kind of look in a chuch, not only because it provides an immediate sensual (and ultimately pedagogical) sucker-punch to the incoming worshiper (the one with some palpable sense, at least), but it exemplifies some of the most ancient elements of the architecural grandeur of our faith; these things had powerful effect for a reason. Namely, centuries of success behind them. But then again, I have been blown away by a few very stark, postmodern examples. The monks' chapel at Immaulate Heart Hermitage (New Camaldoli) at Big Sur always gives me the goosebumps. Like a circular beehive; no adornment save the white altar and dangling wooden Bendictine cross, the whole space, by its shape alone, juxtaposed against a weird, swirling cone-of- a-roof wafting to an open-air apex directly above...wow. I practically have visions. But, if I had my way, all Catholic churches would be designed exactly like the circa 5th century octagonal martyrion--those churches of Palestine, like The Theotokos of Mt. Gerazim, Dome of the Rock, Church of the Kathisma, etc.: ambulatory and jaw-droppingly holy-by-design, somehow. Loads of mosaics. Loads. But that's me. As for the way people are showing-up at mass, I've discovered that this depends upon the ambience that any given congregation (and its priest) will allow. But, I can't deny that, when our sanctuaries in America appear to be Episcopalian-Lite (redundancy, I realize) people tend to show-up in gunny sacks. Disgusting. Then again, to my horror, I've seen some real slobs enter some of Christendom's great churches in Europe for actual liturgy: Chartres; Notre Dame; Santa Maria Maggiore, etc. I do love it, though, that anyone who tries to so much as enter St. Peter's in shorts or fatigues gets practically hauled out by the ear. I don't know that I would like to see *the* Tridentine mass return, but I would like to see a reworked version of it restored for all liturgies. Full Latin w/ complete bells & whistles. That would be great for the solidification of diminishing Catholic identity, but I can't abide the vestments, the lace, the frills and furbelows. Give me a latin Mass with full chant and cumulonimbus clouds of incense, but let the priest be garbed in virtue and simplicity. My take, for what it's worth. Peace, gents.
I like the picture of the beautiful chapel you posted -- what chapel is that? I heartily agree with the whole post -- churches must direct our minds to God by their beauty, not distract us by ugliness.
I can't wait for the new sonnet! :)
By the way, I didn't know you read Fisheaters! :)
Hmm, I must have good inborn sense- I selected that photo from Google Image Search in about five seconds! And thank you, Agnes; I do read Fisheaters sometimes (it's on my sidebar) but it tends to take second priority to the Remnant and a few locales on my blogroll.
I see! I'll assume you don't read the discussion forum...? I post there a lot, though lately it's been becoming somewhat chaotic. There are always some great threads and sensible discussions though. :)
What do you think of this?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,505385,00.html
Did we ever walk on the moon?
I wish Rome would be fair to the creationists and ID people; lately they have been treated almost as unfairly by the Church as they have been by the public school and university systems.
Yes. I am not a conspiracy theorist.
I agree with being fair, because we all believe in more or less the same common goal, and Rome should accept all Catholics.
http://ccrg.info/cas.htm
Please help us by acquiring this Catholic Traditionalist CD and by making a donation
to one of the few left of the remnant Church Militant; designed to expose the
masonic evils of our world and implement philosophies, technologies, and economies
designed to preserve and protect present and future generations.
All challenges or assistance welcomed and encouraged.
Introducing the new Traditionalist Catholic
National Anthem: Guns & Jesus.
http://ccrg.info/cas.htm
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home